Waterfall vs Agile Project Management practices

Waterfall vs Agile Project Management practices

Agile is one of the most well-known software development methodologies that follow an incremental approach to performing tasks. The idea is to deliver products faster, using ERP implementations, while maintaining the integrity of the methodology.

This is a project methodology that is derived from a thought process where requirements and decisions are advanced through collaboration between teams and end-users. Reference: “Waterfall vs Agile project management methodology”, https://everyonegoesagiletoday.wordpress.com/2021/01/07/waterfall-vs-agile-project-management-methodology/ It is a modern approach to development that emphasizes adaptive learning, gradual delivery, evolutionary development, and continuous repetition. It allows changes to be made during the development cycle, which provides flexibility to monitor project progress, thus reducing the risk of failure.

The opinions in the forums regarding the use of the Waterfall project management model are that it is one of the easiest management models.
The Waterfall methodology is one of the earliest models for software development. As the name suggests, this is a sequential process in which progress takes place in several phases from top to bottom, similar to a waterfall. The phases of the waterfall model are requirements analysis, design, development, testing, and implementation. Here, each phase must be fully completed before moving on to the next phase. Reference: “Waterfall and Agile project management”, https://scrumandagiletraining.wordpress.com/2021/01/10/waterfall-and-agile-project-management/

What is the difference between the Waterfall and Agile methodology?

The Agile model delivers a working version of the product very early compared to the Waterfall methodology. Reference: https://wikipedia-lab.org/waterfall-and-incremental-model-in-project-management/As more features are provided gradually, the customer can realize some of the benefits from the beginning. The time for the Agile test cycle is relatively short compared to the Waterfall methodology, as the testing is performed in parallel with the development. The waterfall model is very rigid and relatively less flexible than the Agile model. Due to all these advantages, Agile is preferred to the waterfall methodology at the moment. Reference: Comparison of Agile, Scrum and Waterfall project management, EduWiki.mehttps://eduwiki.me/comparison-of-agile-scrum-and-waterall-project-management/

Advantages of the Waterfall methodology

This is one of the easiest management models. Due to its nature, each phase has specific results and an evaluation process.
It works well for smaller projects where the requirements are easy to understand.
Faster project implementation. Reference: Agile, Scrum and Waterfall project management, ossalumni.orghttps://ossalumni.org/agile-scrum-and-waterfall-project-management/
The development process and results are well documented.
Easily adaptive method for different phase teams.
Specialists in specific fields are better.
This project management methodology is useful for dependency management. Reference: Agile vs Waterfall management methodologyhttps://www.kosovatimes.net/agile-vs-waterfall-management-methodology/

Advantages of the Agile methodology

This is a focused customer process. It, therefore, ensures that the user is continuously switched on during each phase.
Team groups are highly motivated and self-organized, so they are likely to achieve better results in development projects. Reference: Waterfall or Agile? What methodology to choose for your project, PM.MBAhttps://pm.mba/posts/waterfall-vs-agile/
The Agile software development method ensures that the quality of development is maintained.
The process is based entirely on progressive insights. That’s why the user and the team know exactly what’s done and what’s not. This reduces the risks in the development process.

Limitations of Waterfall Project Management

This is not an ideal model for a large project.
If the initial requirements are not clear, this is a less effective method.
It is very difficult to make changes in the closed phases. Reference: Agile vs Waterfall: The Difference Between Methodologies, by Samantha Rhinehttps://www.businesspad.org/agile-vs-waterfall-difference-between-methodologies/
The testing process begins immediately after development. Therefore, there is a high probability of errors, which we will find later in the development. This makes them expensive to repair.

Limitations of the Agile model

This is not a useful method for small development projects. Reference: Agile vs Waterfall Project Management, https://agileprojectmanagement.home.blog/2020/09/01/agile-vs-waterfall-project-management/
This requires an expert to make important decisions during the meeting.
The costs of applying the Agile method are not lower than other development methodologies.
The project can easily derail if the owner of the product does not know what result he wants.

In summary of all this, in answer to your question, there is no single answer.
Depending on nature, subject of the project, its scope, requirements to it, deadlines for its implementation, financing, and the quality of the expected product, it will be necessary to discuss which project management model will be chosen. Reference: Agile vs Waterfall Project Management, https://agileprojectmanagement.home.blog/2020/09/01/agile-vs-waterfall-project-management/
I believe, although I have recently been in your organization, that there are trained professionals in it who will adequately assess the outgoing information, what should be the management model of each future project that we have to deal with.

About the author

My name is Geraldine Jackson. I work as a senior project manager at IBM. The structure of our work includes the distribution of individual projects in teams of 2-3 people.
My profession is extremely multi-layered. It combines creativity and innovation, rules, and norms. It requires imagination but also structuring and organizing.

It involves organizing, managing, and coordinating a project that starts with the investment intention of a client. After getting acquainted with the client’s vision and obtaining the necessary initial data, the project documentation is prepared. In its essence, architectural design is a dynamic process of constant communication and coordination between the individual participants.

All participants have the common goal to satisfy the wishes and requirements of the client while consulting him and helping him make the best decision. The architect as a leading and unifying figure in the project must have enough experience and knowledge not only in his field but also in the essence of the work of the other participants. To have good communication and organizational skills, diplomacy, and tact. In addition to the design stage, the architect is actively involved in the process of implementation of a site. The design and construction process is not without restrictive frameworks, which is why the architect commits to structure the process in time and to follow certain stages.

Project management is an activity that is directly involved in my work as an architect. As a young specialist, I “learn” in the process of work from my senior colleagues. I think that with this course I will get acquainted in a structured and theoretical way with the process that I observe every day. Practical tasks will help me to make sense of different situations and to make informed, motivated decisions in the future. I am motivated by the desire for further development in the profession, the additional qualification would only benefit me. I desire to be as useful as possible to the team I work with and to contribute to the good development and image of the architectural studio.

I perceive myself as an ambitious young woman with a desire for career development in the profession. For the activity of a project manager, I find my communication skills for positive quality. Reference: “Factors affecting the quality of the project”, BVOP.org, 2019, https://bvop.org/posts/quality-in-project-management/ I believe that I know how to communicate clearly and in a structured way with the various specialists I work with. I also communicate and convey clear and comprehensible information.
Coordination skills will be useful for me – I do well in monitoring the work of individual participants, setting clear tasks, and monitoring their correct implementation.

I believe that my ability to structure the work process needs to be improved and developed. With the start of my next working project, I intend to prepare a better and optimized schedule for the design stages, setting a reminder of a certain period for me and the other participants. Deadline for preparation of the schedule – 1 day.

Setting unrealistic goals would hinder the proper performance of my work. I think that coordinating with a senior colleague and talking about my strategy with him would help to restructure and optimize the project. Dividing the tasks into smaller structures and their gradual implementation will help me to complete the individual stages more easily. In a larger sense, this will teach me to gradually cope with more voluminous and diverse tasks and set larger goals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s